[object Object]

The Content Strategy tool sits buried under Marketing -> SEO. Most teams open it once, get confused by the topic clusters visualization, and revert to spreadsheets. That’s a mistake. Used with intent, it’s the best in-platform tool for editorial planning.

What it does well

Maps topics to subtopics visually. Tracks which content covers which subtopic. Surfaces gaps. Connects published posts and pages to the topic graph for internal linking. The visualization is the value; everything else (keyword scoring, difficulty grade) is noise.

What it does badly

Keyword volume estimates are stale. Difficulty scores don’t match what Ahrefs or Semrush report. The “search insights” tab is sometimes weeks out of date. Don’t make ranking decisions from the tool’s data; use it for structure, source data elsewhere.

Set up your topics with intent, not breadth

A common mistake: setting up “Marketing” as a topic. Too broad. The tool can’t reason about it. Set up topics at the cluster level: “Email Deliverability,” “Webinar Funnel Optimization,” “Account-Based Marketing for SMB.” 8-12 topics total per portal. More than that, the visualization stops being useful.

Connect every published post

Every post must be tagged to one and only one topic. Cross-tagging dilutes the cluster graph. If a post genuinely spans two topics, it probably belongs as a pillar update or a new mid-tier piece, not as a cluster post.

Use the gap finder for the editorial calendar

The tool surfaces “subtopics with low coverage.” That list becomes your next quarter’s editorial backlog. Filter to subtopics with high search demand AND low coverage; those are the highest-leverage assignments.

Pillar page health score (use cautiously)

The pillar grade rewards keyword density and inbound internal links. Modern SEO rewards entity coverage and citation. A pillar with a B grade in the tool can outperform an A grade pillar in the wild because the B has better narrative depth.

Use the grade as one signal, not the verdict.

The tool’s internal link recommendations are decent for surfacing missed connections. Review them weekly during editorial standup; pick the highest-confidence ones and add them. Skip the auto-link suggestion; manual is better.

Combine with the Topic API

Operations Hub Enterprise users can pull topic data programmatically:

GET /content/api/v2/topics

Pipe topic coverage and gap data into your content management dashboard. The tool’s UI is fine; the data is more useful exported.

Refresh the topic list quarterly

Topics drift. New ICP segments emerge, old subtopics retire. Audit your topic structure every quarter. Don’t let stale topics dilute the graph.

What to do this week

Audit your topic structure for breadth. If any topic could be 3+ subtopics, split it. Tag your last 20 published posts to topics correctly. Run the gap finder and pick three subtopics for the next sprint’s editorial calendar.

[object Object]
Share